Post by account_disabled on Feb 21, 2024 19:33:07 GMT -10
Destiny holds that will be a year of alternatives to strengthen independent and autonomous civil society organizations of any partisan political sympathies in the face of the possible risks of the relationship with the new government where warning signs have already emerged among unconditional allies. such as the Rosenbleuth Foundation, who endorsed a serious simulation, or the risk that at any time public funds to support the activities of civil society organizations disappear, or are selectively channeled only to those close to them, to the friends of the new administration. Faced with a panorama of chiaroscuro, these are times of emancipatory volunteerism, understood as social actions that are carried out outside of subordination or dependence on public authority. The federation expenditure law proposed by the majority party played with the allocation of resources for social co-investment programs formerly carried out by the National Institute of Social Development.
In nature of volunteering, it will be Finland Mobile Number List necessary to find a fair means to have a disruptive attitude in the face of immediate challenges, abandoning classic positions of volunteering such as pretending to “be the voice of the voiceless” or promoting welfare actions, temptations of the left to justify its political hegemony accompanied by centralizing and concentrating all voluntary efforts (what in Spain they call "volunteer ecumenism") in actions coordinated by the government accompanied by strong ideological loads (such as exclusive nationalisms), such as, for example, the great days of literacy, the Castro harvest, etc. In the situation tha us, several questions arise about civil society, for example, regarding the operation of the National Volunteer Platform. Do its members understand why it should be autonomous from the government? It is not a government platform, but rather a public one. This can be used by its own members for a futile role that produces nothing, or to place themselves at the service of the current government.
Do the actions that civil society organizations undertake in terms of volunteering have to be supervised by the government? In terms of civil protection, is the emergency service owned by the government? Of the platforms to mobilize volunteers that the Mexican Volunteer Alliance has registered, the majority come from initiatives of private entities that are financed by their founders. Recently in CDMX, the platform that Miguel Ángel Mancera created with plenty of opportunism, regarding the earthquakes has been shelved. In the first days of December, as the new capital government took office, “Voluntarios de Corazón” was transformed into “Sentika, Network of volunteers in case of disaster” (due to its name in Nahuatl, which means together), but as is often the case in budding initiatives, the platforms mainly collect information from potential volunteers who They could act in the event of a disaster. Even though there is a Seismic Emergency Plan for Mexico City, there are still no training or training centers on emergencies, shelter care, rescue, evaluation of collapsed structures, etc. to prepare volunteers.
In nature of volunteering, it will be Finland Mobile Number List necessary to find a fair means to have a disruptive attitude in the face of immediate challenges, abandoning classic positions of volunteering such as pretending to “be the voice of the voiceless” or promoting welfare actions, temptations of the left to justify its political hegemony accompanied by centralizing and concentrating all voluntary efforts (what in Spain they call "volunteer ecumenism") in actions coordinated by the government accompanied by strong ideological loads (such as exclusive nationalisms), such as, for example, the great days of literacy, the Castro harvest, etc. In the situation tha us, several questions arise about civil society, for example, regarding the operation of the National Volunteer Platform. Do its members understand why it should be autonomous from the government? It is not a government platform, but rather a public one. This can be used by its own members for a futile role that produces nothing, or to place themselves at the service of the current government.
Do the actions that civil society organizations undertake in terms of volunteering have to be supervised by the government? In terms of civil protection, is the emergency service owned by the government? Of the platforms to mobilize volunteers that the Mexican Volunteer Alliance has registered, the majority come from initiatives of private entities that are financed by their founders. Recently in CDMX, the platform that Miguel Ángel Mancera created with plenty of opportunism, regarding the earthquakes has been shelved. In the first days of December, as the new capital government took office, “Voluntarios de Corazón” was transformed into “Sentika, Network of volunteers in case of disaster” (due to its name in Nahuatl, which means together), but as is often the case in budding initiatives, the platforms mainly collect information from potential volunteers who They could act in the event of a disaster. Even though there is a Seismic Emergency Plan for Mexico City, there are still no training or training centers on emergencies, shelter care, rescue, evaluation of collapsed structures, etc. to prepare volunteers.