Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 22:43:19 GMT -10
Until the last elections, Félix Alonso Cantorné was general director of Consumer Affairs of the Balearic Government. He is now a deputy in Congress for Sumar. Theirs has been the initiative of several reports carried out on IRPH with the support of experts such as Guillem Bou and the lawyers José María Erausquin and Maite Ortiz to denounce the illegality of these abusive rates. The judge from Palma endorsed them in the preliminary ruling that she posed to the CJEU.
“Now, the CJEU, in a ruling of July 14, has made the obvious shortcomings of the IRPH even clearer. While the Supreme Court has not yet ruled on any of the matters it has, the Singapore Email List first sentence that was collected a few days ago from the Provincial Court of the Balearic Islands maintains the thesis of the Supreme Court, ignoring the recommendations of the CJEU in said ruling. , explains this deputy.
Cantorne has been at the concentration in Madrid on IRPH and increasing mortgages that has been organized by the group of affected people with the support also of the PAH of Madrid in front of the Supreme Court. In statements to Economist & Jurist she points out shortly before her intervention that “ the Supreme Court must endorse the CJEU's theses from the last ruling of July of this year. We cannot forget that it is Europe that currently determines the scope of justice in Spain with community jurisprudence that is mandatory for any of the 27 EU states.”
Felix Alonso Cantorné addresses those gathered in Madrid in front of the Supreme Court headquarters. (Photo: E&J)
In his opinion, “ it is a matter of time before the IRPH is brought down . ” From Sumar, now as a deputy in Congress, we are going to fight for this legislative reform . It is an illegal index as we have demonstrated with our studies in Consumption of the Balearic Islands. If this question is not prejudicial, it will be the ones that are pending resolution that will end up annulling it. For a few years now its abusive nature has been clear , perhaps due to its complexity the Supreme Court has not fully seen this problem that it generates for many families.”
From this report carried out by Consumo de Baleares “ it is logical that at a legal level there are some interpretations, but at a financial and mathematical level there cannot be . Reading it, one observes the existence of double remuneration from the IRPH that the Balearic Court has not analyzed in its ruling. The Balearic ruling talks about transparency, but it does not talk about what the CJEU tells you to focus on specific issues and commissions.